Both staff augmentation and managed services offer solutions to businesses that need assistance in various areas. Deciding which option best fits your business will depend on individual requirements such as budget, the skill set needed, scalability, and timeline. This article will review the differences between staff augmentation and managed services, helping you make an informed decision.
What is Staff Augmentation?
Staff Augmentation hires a third-party expert or organization on a contract basis to help complete specific organizational tasks. This arrangement benefits businesses needing assistance with specialized work that requires a particular skill set or experience. Staff Augmentation is typically seen as a cost-effective approach, as the organization only pays for the services they require when needed. The service provider is usually responsible for the costs related to hiring, training, and management of the staff being hired.
Pros & Cons of Staff Augmentation
To evaluate whether or not staff augmentation is the right option for your business, consider the advantages and disadvantages.
Some of the benefits associated with this option include the following.
Immediate Access to the Best Expertise
Staff augmentation gives businesses access to the best and most experienced experts in a particular field. With this approach, companies can hire an external specialist with the specific skills they need for a short-term project or to fill an immediate skill gap in their existing team. This allows them to get up and run quickly without having to take on the overhead of hiring a new full-time employee.
Cost Savings
Staff augmentation can be very cost-effective for businesses, as it typically involves lower overhead costs than taking on a full-time employee. This can be especially beneficial for small businesses that may not have the budget to invest in permanent staff or are looking to save money on staffing services. Additionally, businesses can adjust their staff augmentation resources according to their specific budget constraints and project demands.
Flexible Workforce
One major advantage of staff augmentation is its flexibility; companies can scale up or down as needed without worrying about managing a full-time workforce. With this approach, businesses can easily add new team members to complete a project quickly or reduce costs when demand lessens. This also allows them to access expertise from different geographical areas that may not be available locally. As the staff augmentation model is typically project-based, businesses can discontinue a contract once the project is completed.
Focus on Core Competencies
Businesses can focus their time and resources on their core competencies by outsourcing tasks and services to a staff augmentation company. This approach enables them to get the best results in terms of quality and efficiency while freeing up valuable internal resources that can be used for other strategic projects. Additionally, by leveraging staff augmentation companies’ expertise in various areas and technologies, businesses can reduce the risk of errors. As in-house team members are not as well versed in the latest technology, outsourcing can provide businesses with an edge to stay competitive.
Just as the benefits of staff augmentation, there are also some potential drawbacks.
Lack of Long-Term Commitment
The short-term nature of the staff augmentation model can be both an advantage and a disadvantage. While businesses can scale up or down as needed, they may struggle to build relationships with their external team members, who are not committed in the long term to the client company. This could result in additional costs to recruit and train new specialists for each project.
Difficulty Assessing Quality
It can be difficult for businesses to assess the quality of staff augmentation services before deciding, as they may not have prior knowledge or experience with external team members. This could result in unreliable deliverables and higher-than-expected costs if additional work is required due to mistakes. Plus, there is no guarantee that the specialist will remain available on future projects if their skills are in high demand elsewhere in the house.
Limited Control
Businesses using staff augmentation typically have less control over their external team than those working with an entire team of dedicated full-time employees. This could lead to communication breakdowns and unclear expectations, which can cause delays in project completion. Addition to that, businesses may not have access to the same level of expertise as they would have with a dedicated team of full-time employees.
Do you want your business to reach new heights thanks to a team of growth experts?
Contact Growth Hackers
What are Managed Services?
Managed services are IT solutions offered by external companies and managed by their teams. This approach typically involves a long-term contract and a service level agreement allowing businesses to outsource services such as network and security management, cloud computing, software development, database management, etc. The external service provider manages and maintains the IT infrastructure, ensuring it is secure and reliable. As the managed services model requires a long-term commitment, companies that choose this route can usually benefit from reduced costs and the expertise of experienced professionals.
Pros & Cons of Managed Services
Just as with staff augmentation, managed services also have their own set of pros and cons. First, let’s look at the advantages of using managed services.
Increased Efficiency
Managed services can increase efficiency by reducing the time and effort spent on certain tasks. Managers no longer need to worry about hiring and training new staff or dealing with any related administrative duties. Instead, they can focus more of their efforts on core business activities. Furthermore, managed services provide access to an experienced team of professionals who are already knowledgeable of the industry and can provide their expertise quickly. This ultimately results in faster solutions to problems and increased business efficiency.
Less Risk
Managed services can help reduce the risks associated with certain processes, as they are generally provided by third-party experts familiar with the best practices for managing such processes. This knowledge and experience in such services can help to eliminate potential errors or oversights, thus reducing the risks of a costly mistake. Additionally, managed services are typically provided on a pay-as-you-go basis, which helps to reduce the financial risk associated with investing in new staff or equipment.
Bringing Focus to Operations
When opting for managed services, businesses can focus on their core operations while leaving the rest to be managed it an experienced third-party team. This allows managers and employees to devote more time and energy to tasks essential to the business’s long-term success. Additionally, it helps free up resources that can be invested in areas such as marketing or customer service.
Now, let’s look at the disadvantages of using managed services:
Lack of Control
One potential downside to using managed services is that it can give businesses little control over certain processes or tasks. This lack of control may concern managers who prefer more autonomy over their business activities. Additionally, this lack of control can also result in an increased cost to businesses if they need to make any changes or adjustments. At the same time, managed services are provided by third-party vendors.
Usually, making changes to managed services is more expensive as compared to staff augmentation. Like with any outsourcing decision, it is important to weigh the cost of making changes or adjustments against the overall cost savings that can be obtained.
Missed Opportunities
Managed services may limit the opportunities for businesses to innovate and stay ahead of their competitors. For example, a managed services provider may not provide access to cutting-edge technologies or processes that could give a business a competitive edge over rivals.
Furthermore, when using managed services, businesses are limited to what the provider offers and thus cannot customize solutions according to their specific needs or preferences. Like any service model, managed services also come with inherent risks, such as provider lock-in (forcing you to continue using their services) or lack of control over the quality of service you receive.
Lack of Flexibility
Another downside of managed services is that they can be inflexible and may not adapt to the changing needs of a business. For example, managed services typically require businesses to commit to long-term contracts, which can limit their ability to make adjustments or changes in the future. Additionally, suppose a business decides to switch its managed service providers. In that case, it will need to go through the process of finding a new provider and negotiating another contract – leading to additional delays and inconvenience.
Businesses must carefully weigh the pros and cons before committing to a long-term agreement when considering managed services.
Keep your business running smoothly with staff augmentation or managed services.
Staff Augmentation vs Managed Services: Which One Should your Business Pick?
Whether to use managed services or staff augmentation will ultimately depend on a business’s specific needs, management resources, and preferences. Let’s help you in making an informed decision according to your needs.
Cost & Resource Savings
Managed services offer cost and resource savings to businesses compared to staff augmentation. With a managed services company, you only pay for the services you need and don’t have to worry about costly onboarding processes or invest in expensive hardware and software. Additionally, with managed services, you don’t have to hire additional staff for each assignment. You can avoid the time and costs associated with employment – salary payments, benefits, etc.- ultimately reducing operational costs. On the other hand, staff augmentation can be expensive because you are responsible for paying for the onboarding and training your new employees.
Control & Flexibility
Regarding control and flexibility, staff augmentation is often considered a better option than managed services. With staff augmentation, you have more direct control over the project and can modify it in real time. Additionally, you can hire people with specific skills and expertise tailored to your business needs. On the contrary, managed services require trust between you and the service provider – especially when controlling tasks and ensuring quality standards. You also have limited flexibility when making modifications on short notice.
Security
Regarding security, managed services and staff augmentation both offer distinct advantages depending on your security requirements. With staff augmentation, you can protect your data by completely controlling who has access to your systems and applications. However, managing security can be a tedious process and requires significant investment in terms of resources. Also managed services offer enhanced security measures that protect your data more effectively. By outsourcing to a managed service provider, you can entrust that they will adhere to industry best practices when protecting your data.
Quality
Finally, regarding quality with staff augmentation, you can be certain that the people working on your project are highly skilled and experienced in their field of expertise. This ensures a higher level of quality control and accuracy. On the other hand, with managed services, you usually don’t have direct access to the managed service model provider’s resources or processes – which can make it difficult to monitor quality standards and ensure accurate results. When you choose a managed service provider, opt for one with a proven track record of delivering quality services.
From the above discussion, it becomes clear that each option – staff outsourced team augmentation vs managed services – offers unique benefits. Ultimately, your choice will depend on your business’s specific requirements and preferences. Evaluate both options carefully before deciding to ensure success.
Final Words on Staff Augmentation vs Managed Services
There is no right or wrong answer when choosing between staff augmentation and managed services. Ultimately, the decision should be based on what best serves your business’s needs. If you require specialized knowledge, staff augmentation may be a better option since you can hire employees with the specific skillset you need.
On the other hand, if you are looking for more control over processes and cost savings in the long run, then managed services are likely the better choice. Ultimately, considering factors such as cost, flexibility, scalability, and expertise will help guide you toward making an informed decision that makes the most sense for your company. Whatever solution you choose, it’s important to clearly understand your business requirements and objectives to make the best decision for long-term success. Good Luck!
Growth Hackers is surely one of the best integrated marketing agencies helping businesses from all over the world grow. There is no fluff with Growth Hackers. We help entrepreneurs and business owners choose between staff augmentation and managed services, increase their productivity, generate qualified leads, optimize their conversion rate, gather and analyze data analytics, acquire and retain users and increase sales. We go further than brand awareness and exposure. We make sure that the strategies we implement move the needle so your business grow, strive and succeed. If you too want your business to reach new heights, contact Growth Hackers today so we can discuss about your brand and create a custom growth plan for you. You’re just one click away to skyrocket your business.
